Update the Inside XSEDE format.
|Many staff don't read it in its current format. Create a shorter, more modern version of telling elevator pitch vs. current Inside XSEDE format. Per NSF request at midyear review, make sure what we're putting out provides a 10,000 ft view vs. starting with deeper dives.|
|Science Highlights titles to include why everyone should care about this.||Science Highlights should include why everyone should care about this. The Science highlights rubric includes this. The title also needs to convey this.|
|Shorten Inside XSEDE||Many staff feel current format is too long. Look at options to shorten Inside XSEDE, provide links to do deeper dives if interested.||ER staff Kristin Williamson; Hannah Remmert|
|Inside XSEDE readership.||Provide analytics on readership of Inside XSEDE.||ER team Hannah Remmert; Kristin Williamson|
|Solicit content topics from SP Forum.||More unallocated SPs than allocated and they ask for different things. Many examples of impact with these SPs. Communicate with J. Ray Scott at PSC, the SP Forum chair.||ER team Kristin Williamson|
Notes/ Discussion items: