Decisions:
Summary | Description |
---|---|
Action Items:
Summary | Description | Responsible | Due Date |
---|---|---|---|
Follow up with Ken about discrepancy between reviewing rubric and instructions | done | Robert Sinkovits | |
Follow up with Ken about items that automatically make a proposal rejected being stated earlier in the proposal (ie declaring other supercomputing allocations, scaling document, etc) | done | Robert Sinkovits | |
Come up with a follow up process for staff who have been onboarded/offboarded | Karla Gendler, Marques Bland | ||
Create a form letter that is a welcome letter to ECSS Review ECSS onboarding materials Send link to ECSS mgmt. to onboarding materials | Robert Sinkovits, Philip Blood | ||
Create a new JIRA project for ECSS onboarding (perhaps Confluence template) | Marques Bland | ||
| Jay Alameda | ||
ECSS ALL topics
| |||
Notes/ Discussion items:
- The overall sentiment from the Focus Group was that staff is happy with their jobs. They realize they have a difficult job, but they enjoy the job they do
- General discussion
- Proposal Process
- Perhaps have a ECSS all meeting and discuss reviews and the process of reviewing proposals
- For L3 managers: if you have new ECSS staff, make sure they're aware of their ability to recommend ECSS support and their ability to have an active role in bringing projects to ECSS
- Also, when new people are onboarded, we should make a more concerted effort to make sure the new staff is known throughout ECSS
- Lonnie: we should do something more deliberate for onboarding
- We need better communication between L3s and sub-award PIs
- If a new staff comes on board whose direct manager is not funded by XSEDE, we need to determine a way to handle that
- Would it be helpful to make the onboarding process a JIRA process? Yes.
- Should we have a standard process for onboarding new staff?
- Also, when new people are onboarded, we should make a more concerted effort to make sure the new staff is known throughout ECSS
- Project Assignments
- Staff don't know there's a live dashboard for project assignments
- L3 assigning projects should follow up and let people know how projects have been assigned
- Training
- We do need to roll out the 10% training time to staff so that they're actually aware of how it works
- Come up with ideas of how the staff can take advantage of the time
- Getting a handle on travel budgets is a key piece
- Perhaps use a PIF to get a training session for the staff and have that attached to PEARC
- The downside is that one side doesn't fit all
- Also how many ECSS staff have funding to go to PEARC
- Projects/PI Interactions
- We need to come up with a better "break up" process to just cut off a project that is constantly requesting extensions
- Proposal Process