Child pages
  • 20180606- Panel Session: Project Governance & Trends Analysis
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

Decisions:

 Summary
Description

 

 
  

Action Items:

Summary
Description
Responsible
Due Date
Management & Governance – John   
Slide 2 add reference to TerraGrid John6/8/2018
Slide 3 replace org chart or use the one Ron sent John6/8/2018
Slide 10 what is the status of the Staff Climate Survey Lorna/Lizanne6/8/2018
Slide 11 update names John6/8/2018
Slide 6 Suggestion from Shawn Strande via chat to include names of XAB and UAC and not just that they exist John6/8/2018
Slide 16 suggestion that it is a rabbit hole–remove it John6/8/2018
Slide 7 missing slide number John6/8/2018
Budget & Metrics – Ron   
Before slide 2 need an introduction to transition to new topic Ron6/8/2018

Slides 4 and 5 will raise questions; have a list of contributing factors

  • non-FTE budget as an explanation (explains NCSA)
  • Unspent hardware investment; emergence of public cloud acceptance holding for that transition–will hear more in Ops discussion
    • add another color for hardware line
  • Source of what the projected is
  • Travel will increase with PEARC
  • Projection is not based on reality
  • Use annual for projection rather than 6 months
  • Purposes for underspending
  • Staff turnover – would be good to have data on that for hiring lag
  • Year 1 partners were spending down carryover from prior award
  • Need to then answer the question what are you going to do about it
  • TACC explanation for lean amounts
  • Authorization to spend in February, and award processing takes time
  • Emphasize the % under spending rather than value and how that calculates into weeks (5 weeks?)
  • Large award
  • Illinois takes back unspent funds; whatever carryover allow to keep either 2 months average spend up to a max of $200k so some money is tied up in that carryover
  • Managing responsibly
 Ron6/8/2018
Provided TACC projected amounts with explanation for lean amounts Kelly/Karla6/8/2018
Trend Analysis – Dave   
Use of term "Traditional users" is different in ECSS...logins, command-line users, etc.; send Nancy graphic Dave6/8/2018
R1 terminology now called Major Research Institution (MRI) Dave6/8/2018
Visualization isn't going down, but you're seeing heterogeneous systems where the work is going Dave6/8/2018
Look at growth of GPU users Dave6/8/2018
Caution: classifying by resource type not by the work they are doing; not sure it will help case. Data-intensive computing portion is wrong–remove or refine Dave6/8/2018
Trend in usage of GPUs and Phis Dave6/8/2018
Trend of diversity from Nancy's slide Dave6/8/2018
How are people solving the problems today and how is that changing? Dave6/8/2018
Talking narrowly for those who have allocation on XSEDE, there could be extended community............use of users could be defined Dave6/8/2018
Fields of science trends Dave6/8/2018
Keywords query of abstracts Dave6/8/2018

Trends for L2s to consider–should be talking about these things–qualitative or quantitative data observations

  • Does XCI campus interaction equate to institutions deploying?
  • XCI Instrumenting software components to determine usage?
  • CEE champions, trainings, student preparation, PI interactions, etc.
 L2s6/8/2018

Notes/ Discussion items:

 

  • No labels