Decisions:
Summary | Description |
|---|---|
| TG Prefix Remains QMA-410 - Getting issue details... STATUS | Decision to leave the TG prefix alone and not make any attempt to remove it from the allocations. |
Action Items:
Summary | Description | Responsible | Due Date |
|---|---|---|---|
Get SMT approval for revised Field of Science list" QMA-411 - Getting issue details... STATUS | After relevant stakeholders (SP Forum, XDMoD team, UAC, and XRAC) are engaged and offered a chance to comment, and after experiences are sought from EGI, PRACE and potentially other US entities, the final, proposed revised FOS hierarchy will be brought to SMT for approval, accompanied by a summary of stakeholder comments and responses. | Dave Hart |
|
Notes/ Discussion items:
how to manage the amount and variety of content in the list/ ultimately not to exhaustively categorize everything possible but rather
Stakeholder review (XD Forum, XDMOD, UAC, XRAC)- how do we propose to manage the list; make sure that this will not break things that rely on the current list
need SMT approval to move forward and conversation with NSF PO
might be strange for existing PIs since it will be different... some sort of notification/ heads up to let them know
How hard should we push to get rid of the "TG" prefix... it would require some level of effort and take time away from other priorities
One option would be to phase it out by starting new ones without a prefix at all
Details: